SCI论文写作总结:如何描写条形图?
发布于 2021-05-11 17:26 ,所属分类:论文学习资料大全
来源:
DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108159

As expected,soil moisture was significantly higher inambient than in drought plots (P = 0.03, Fig. 2A). Moreover, soil moisture wassignificantly higher in winter (June 2018) comparedto summer (January 2018) (P < 0.0001), while the drought effect was largerin winter than in summer causing a significant drought × season interaction effect (P = 0.04). Across both season, drought significantly increased microbial CUE (P =0.001, Fig. 2B). In contrast, we observed significantlyhigher CUE in winter when soils weregenerally wet compared to summer when soilswere dry (P < 0.0001, Fig. 2B).

Season had significant effects onmajor microbial groups such as fungi, bacteria, and actinobacteria(总). Fungal PLFAs were highest in summer andlowest in winter (P < 0.0001, Fig. 3A). In contrast, bacterial and actinobacterialPLFAs were highest in winter and lowest in summer (P < 0.01, Fig. 3Band D). Consequently, the fungi: bacteriaratio was significantly higher in summer than in winter (P < 0.0001, Fig. 3C). We observed no maineffects of drought on any of themicrobial groups, but the fungi: bacteriaratio increased with drought in summer, and decreasedwith drought in winter, causing asignificant drought × season interaction (P = 0.01, Fig. 3C).

We observed no significant main or interactive effects ofdrought on any of the four EEs (both hydrolytic, Hy and oxidative, Ox)activities we measured (Fig. 5). However, both β-glucosidase (BG, Hy) and peroxidase (PER,Ox) activity were significantly higher insummer than in winter.
以上,基本上都是总分的句式,标蓝部分是句式词汇,每天看看。








![[Android] 全套毕业论文写作指导 android电子市场(搭建环境+Galaxy S2模拟器全套+论文+代码+SVN)](https://static.kouhao8.com/sucaidashi/xkbb/41b11495e23c9df422ea269815e8a1ec.jpg?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/resize,w_88/crop,w_88,h_88,g_nw)























相关资源